Case Assessment Research™

How arbitrators will access your case

Our Case Assessment Research™ delivers a rigorous analysis that extends far beyond traditional legal review. Drawing on our expertise in arbitration, behavioural science, and decision–making research, we design empirical studies to measure how our arbitral tribunals are likely to respond both emotionally and cognitively to your case. This approach enables us to assess potential outcomes and awards, resulting in a systematic evaluation of your case’s strengths, vulnerabilities, and the optimal strategic approach.

ASL Transcript Analysis™

Decoding Tribunal Psychology

Most hearing transcript analysis tells you what happened. Ours tells you what it means. The result is not a summary of proceedings. It is strategic intelligence — identifying the motivational forces shaping arbitrator decisions and translating them into actionable guidance for the sessions ahead.

Witness Effectiveness Research™

Measuring Credibility and Persuasive Impact

Rather than relying on intuition, it reveals how arbitrators are likely to process information and form judgments about witnesses.

These insights enable strategic decisions about:

  • Witness selection: Choosing between multiple potential experts or fact witnesses based on predicted impact
  • Preparation focus: Identifying specific communication weaknesses.
  • Tactical deployment: Determining witness order and emphasis based on measured strengths
  • Risk assessment: Understanding potential vulnerabilities before they’re exposed in live testimony

 

Expertise: Our Staff

Our team of behavioural science experts have earned advanced degrees in affect and social psychology, sociology, data analytics, neuroscience, and AI engineering from institutions including Oxford, Cambridge, and leading universities in the United States. This multidisciplinary expertise enables us to apply rigorous scientific methodology to the complex human dynamics of international arbitration, delivering insights that transform how our clients approach their most consequential disputes.

YOUR OPPONENTS MAY STILL RELY ON INTUITION AND EXPERIENCE.
 
CAN YOU AFFORD TO COMPETE AGAINST OPPONENTS THAT DON’T?